Aussies building new houses on smaller land

It appears Australians have been sacrificing a lot of yard space over the past decade — new data show that they are building the same size of new homes but the land they are constructing them on to has been shrinking since 2012.

Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that the average land size of new houses decreased by 13%, down from 496 square metres in 2012 to 432 square metres in 2021.

The decline has been steady since 2012, except in 2016 when the site area for new houses increased in size.

Capital cities across the five largest states followed the downtrend, resulting in a more denser housing situation.

Greater Brisbane reported the biggest drop in average site area, down by 20% over the past decade from 571 square metres to 459 square metres.

Of all capital cities, Greater Adelaide posted the smallest decline in average land size at only 6%, from 498 square metres to 468 square metres.




Average site areas for new houses





Greater Capital City Statistical Area



Size (square metres)





2012



2021





Greater Sydney



514



423





Greater Melbourne



490



429





Greater Brisbane



571



459





Greater Adelaide



498



468





Greater Perth



448



399





Combined Capital Cities



496



432




New house size staying the same

Interestingly, the average floor area of new houses approved over the last 10 years only declined by 1%, down from 245 square metres in 2012 to 242 square metres in 2021. This has led to an increase in the ratio of floor-to-site during the period, from 0.49 to 0.56.

Across the five biggest state capitals, Perth and Sydney reported the highest decrease in average floor size, with both reporting a 7% decrease.

Meanwhile, the average floor size of new homes in Melbourne remained the same over the past 10 years at 247 square metres.




Average floor areas for new houses





Greater Capital City Statistical Area



Size (square metres)





2012



2021





Greater Sydney



271



254





Greater Melbourne



247



247





Greater Brisbane



229



241





Greater Adelaide



209



220





Greater Perth



229



214





Combined Capital Cities



245



242




Why land sizes are shrinking

REA Group economic analyst Megan Lieu said the cost of land is on top of the reasons why the trend of shrinking land sizes exists.

“With an expanding population, the amount of land we have in suburban areas is becoming more finite — this means that Australians have to pay a premium to buy homes with more land,” she said.

This could continue, Ms Lieu believes, as the increase in cost of living and rising rates make it impossible for Australians to pay premium on land.

The rise in urban infill is also a reason behind the trend.

“This involves repurposing underutilised areas, such as open green-space, of existing suburbs to build additional housing,” Ms Lieu said

“As most suburbs undergoing this transformation have infrastructure and transport, shared community spaces and are closer to jobs, land plots in these developments are smaller than what may be offered further out.”

Photo by @zacgudakov on Unsplash


Top Suburbs :


flemington

,

belmont

,

st marys

,

narara

,

leumeah


Get help with your investment property


Do you need help finding the right loan for your investment?

When investing in property, it is important to make sure that you not only have the lowest available rate that you can get, but also have the correct loan features for your needs.

Just fill in a few details below and we’ll then arrange for a local mortgage broker to contact you and work out what features or types of loans are right for your needs. We’ll even help with the paperwork. Plus an appointment is free.

 

We value your privacy and treat all your information seriously – you can check out
our privacy policy here

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.