Why the blue chip is BS

06/12/2018

The golden rule of ownership is clear: invest only in prime properties. That means Sydney inside and Melbourne inside, and ignore everything else, right? Please, no!

Here's the thing: there is no favorite place to invest. It's an excellent database! Australia is a huge country with hundreds of towns and villages. Each location has its own economic profile, diverse lifestyle attractions and affordable prices. Those of us who have taken the time to thoroughly study historical evidence know that all markets have already experienced a period of prosperity, that all markets have experienced periods of declining prices and that They will all experience positive and negative periods in the future.

However, to be honest, those who invested in Narrabri 20 years ago will have earned more money than those who invested in Bondi. Similarly, South Gippsland outperformed South Yarra. We will dissect the evidence of these and other examples shortly.

The eight states and territories of Australia have 550 municipal councils, of which 139 are in capital cities and 411 in regional Australia.

Australia has thousands and thousands of suburbs and the real estate investment sector is littered with stories of old women and myths that are not supported by historical evidence. Make no mistake: Every place has had good years, bad years and normal years in between.

Bias of Confidence
If you ask me, even if they have good intentions, those who claim that certain places are "first class investments" are strongly influenced by an emotional fondness for a specific place, usually based on their personal place of residence (or aspiring to live), where they like to go on vacation, or just an old ego.

Some companies that preach the myth of the first order do so because of their own interest in promoting a specific place. Often, their business model relies entirely on the fact that the public is always attracted by the purchase of a property at location X.

According to these companies, regardless of the short-term prospects for their preferred location, all roads still lead to this location. Even when the real estate market of the city in question is unsatisfactory, you will find them pretending that their first-rate plot is immune – just keep an ear to the old "there are markets in the markets".

First-rate brainwashing generally implies that one should only invest in pockets of affluence in one of the five largest Australian capitals. Apparently, everywhere in Australia, the plebs reign everywhere – how could one expect real estate prices to exceed those of Silvertail City?

Some seem convinced that one should only invest in central Sydney or Melbourne, where a typical property costs a million dollars north. They will tell you that annual detention costs of between $ 30,000 and $ 50,000 are a justifiable expense for blue chip companies. If you do not have this type of room, you should not invest at all. Now, if it's not snobbery, it's certainly unwise.

Most humans crave beautiful things, so no one should blame those who have the means to live in this city. Many people also like lobster, but most can not afford it. Meat and potatoes, on the other hand … The home of a person is his castle, whether in Snobville or Sh! Tsville. But if their main objective for buying a property is the potential financial return, it will be wise to understand that the largest pool of future buyers (demand) is the home of our middle class (95% of the company Australian).

What goes up …
Narrowness played a big role in this bias. I do not encourage anyone to invest in something he does not understand. It is impossible for an investor to give himself a chance to make the best decision if he does not first correctly consider all of his options. To do this, one must be open minded and ready to learn.

Media horror stories that draw attention to a small portion of the lesser-known real estate markets declining by 20% to 40% over a given period of time hardly encourage people to expand their backgrounds. But understand this: each market is experiencing declines. While prices in prestige markets are less likely to fall due to a large percentage value, smaller declines in much larger values ​​may equate to a similar dollar value.

For example, Sydney's economic slowdown is only about a year away, and even in the most popular places like Northern Beaches, values ​​have already dropped by 8%, according to CoreLogic. Who knows, but let's say prices go down another 5% before reaching the floor. This is a capital loss of $ 150,000 plus the average annual cost of holding $ 20,000. I ask you: is not it risky?

"First-rate brainwashing involves investing only in pockets of plenty within one of the five largest Australian capitals"

If an investor had bought a property in Silvertail City 20 years ago, he would certainly have made a lot of money. They would have experienced two periods of strong expansion, a few years of lower prices and some phases of normal growth. The same could be said of a very large number of localities where middle-class Australians live, including cities in cities other than capital cities.

Over the past 20 years, the so-called Sydney suburb, Lane Cove (median real estate price of $ 2,232,000 – March 2018) has resulted in an average annual increase in the price of the property. median real estate of 8.4%. The same growth rate was observed in St Helens Park, Sydney suburb (median $ 590,000), Yass Valley Regional Municipality, NSW (median $ 607,000), Geelong in Victoria Regional Center (median $ 520,000) and in the suburbs of Hobart, New Town (median $ 592,000). Many other capitals and regions have had higher growth rates.

Nobody has a crystal ball; However, a qualified real estate investment firm has a duty to test whether the historical evidence corroborates or contradicts the myths and stories of old women. Twenty years of official CoreLogic data is an absolute mockery of the first-rate BS.

Imagine an investor looking to buy a typical Balmain apartment at an average price of $ 1.3 million. They would first need to save $ 320,000 (in cash) to cover their 20% deposit and stamp duty, then they would have to shell out $ 17,000 each year to fill the gap between rental income and expenses.

Acknowledging the considerable opportunity cost that there is to stay away while saving a large deposit, a large number of investors are increasing their filing and deposit costs. 39 acquisition using the equity of the existing properties. In the case of Balmain, the highest leverage brings the holding cost to $ 34,000 a year.

The value of a typical Balmain apartment in Sydney has increased by $ 1 million ($ 340,000) over the past 20 years (source: CoreLogic). So, the price of buying blue-chip is paying off. Or does it?

This average annual growth rate of 6.9% is similar to that of many regions of New South Wales, such as Dubbo (6.3%) and Orange (6.5%). Higher growth rates have been produced in many other NSW sites, including Kempsey (7.2%), Mudgee (7.6%) and Newcastle (8.5%).

The affluent suburbs are located in all major cities. In addition to the obvious high entry price, it is expected that the features and benefits of each property will be maintained in keeping with the high standards of the City of Silvertail. CoreLogic can not capture these capital costs – often involving major renovations between the date of purchase and the eventual sale – meaning that the changes reported in the median value of properties in these suburbs likely overestimate the actual growth of the property. capital.

"Higher price, wealth, and desire go against [demand] … because there is a much smaller pool of buyers that can afford these properties"

Be that as it may, as the right-hand tables show, the growth rates in many places in which the Australian middle class lives are comparable to, or even higher than, those of the titmouse city. When the rental returns and the significant annual costs associated with holding a property are added to the equation to generate a total return for the investor, the evidence is compelling: the blue chip is devoid meaning, and the strongest demand from buyers concerns meat and potatoes.

Smarts, not status
In life in general, there will always be people who believe what they want to believe. There is absolutely nothing wrong with investing in a so-called luxury suburb.

But be aware that higher prices, wealth, and desire are counter to demand, which is detrimental to the growth equation, because the number of buyers who can afford these properties is more reduced.

The important thing is to understand the real factors that influence real estate markets. Investing is too big a decision to rely on mythology. No one can predict the future, but savvy investors understand what the term "fundamentals" means; they know how to analyze them and they understand the importance of buying at the beginning (and not at the end) of the growth cycle of a chosen place.

At the end of the day, big companies such as CBA, Qantas, BHP, Telstra and Woolworths are having good and bad times. Smart equity investors know the difference between the two.

"The goal of the game is to overcome emotions and ignore personal prejudices in order to truly consider the option 100%"

Investors in savvy stocks also understand the importance of not putting all their eggs in one basket. If one can afford to invest in a reputed top-notch suburb, an intelligent solution would be to split the investment capital (or deposit funds) into smaller parts and diversify its assets. investments in multiple properties located in completely different regions of Australia.

The goal of the game is to overcome emotions and ignore personal biases in order to truly consider 100% of the options and give your hard-earned money a chance to work as hard as possible.

An analysis of the historical performance of virtually every Australian location since the turn of the century shows that capital growth and larger cash flows occur when a city or village associates a price with affordable median real estate. and a period of sustained confidence, generally driven by economic development.

It's always a good time to invest in real estate. The key question is where and when. As our graphs illustrate, different markets will give very different results at different times.

My advice is, do not be sidelined to read media reports. At the time you read several consecutive months of good performance, you may have missed 30% of the total growth generated by this cycle in this market. And as historical evidence has taught us, it is unlikely that media reports will warn of the many less known places that have generated higher total returns than the dovetailed city.

To show that I was putting my money where my mouth was, as recently as February of this year, I personally invested in another non-capital exciting place in the capital. I bought a low-maintenance three-bedroom house close to the CBD for only $ 375,000. It costs nothing to hold each year and prices start to change at a double-digit rate.

Employment growth at this location is already underway, community confidence is high and several major job creation projects are to begin shortly. I think it's at the very beginning of the growth cycle of this place. Remember: the biggest risk is to never invest at all.

Simon Pressley
is the managing director of
Propertyology and three times
Agent of the Year of the Australian Buyer (REIA)

Do you have more than $ 200,000 in your super fund? You Can Use Your Super To Buy A Property – Find Out How

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.